Computer assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry

Automated pure-tone audiometry: an analysis of capacity, need, and benefit. Am J Audiol Dec;17(2) Gates GA, Murphy M, Rees TS, Fraher A. Screening for handicapping hearing loss in the elderly. J Fam Pract Jan;52(1) Ho AT, Hildreth AJ, Lindsey L. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry. Is computer-assisted audiometry as reliable as manual audiometry in an NHS setting?: Abstracts of the Spring Meeting of the Otorhinolaryngological Research SocietyThe following are the.  · Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry. Ho AT 1, Hildreth AJ, Lindsey L. Author information. Affiliations. 1 author. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK. Otology Neurotology: Cited by:

Download Citation | Computer-Assisted Audiometry Versus Manual Audiometry | The Otogram is an automated computer-assisted audiometer that allows patients to self-administer audiometry for their. Versus Manual Audiometry. Objective: The Otogram is an automated computer-assisted audiometer that allows patients to self-administer audiometry for their pure-tone audiogram. There has been no research published in a peer-reviewed journal, validating its use in an otology outpatient clinic. A total of % of manual and automated 4FAs were within 10 dB (i.e., ±5 dB); % were within 15 dB. However, there were significant (p automated and manual audiometry at , , 1,, and 2, Hz (air-conduction) and and 1, Hz (bone-conduction).

Background: Hearing screening tests based on pure-tone audiometry may Lindsey L. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry. Objective: The Otogram is an automated computer-assisted audiometer that allows patients to self-administer audiometry for their pure-tone audiogram. Equinox is a PC-based audiometer, which includes the Stenger test, high-frequency audiometry, pure tone audiometry and a lot more.